How often does folding vs. small sized bets come up?
Maybe it’s not a specific min-raise, but it’s a damn tiny raise.
Perhaps it’s not that precise structure, however it’s close enough. Maybe it’s on another street you see small sized bets..
BBchecks, Greg Bets $45, BTN Reraise to $90, BB Folds and now what Greg??
The truth of the matter is, when you are encountering small sized bets or raises, the much less commonly you need to fold.
This ought to be evident because you are obtaining excellent pot chances. When encountering a 1/3-pot sized bet you are getting 4:1 on a call. If you encounter a min-raise postflop, you usually get back at much better odds. Because you don’t have to win the pot that frequently to continue — it’s very easy to see that folding frequently is going to be a significant blunder.
Truthfully, folding too often versus smaller sized raises is an even larger concern previously in the hand. I see way too many individuals offering tiny 3bets lots of respect– and folding hands like AQ, JTo, etc.
Specifically preflop, these hands have heaps of equity! As well as given the terrific pot odds, it’s criminal to fold that equity.
Yet this exact same issue occurs on the flop too.
Consider the variety of times Greg folds JJ or 88 on that K95 flop since “V simply needs to have a more powerful hand.” Or Greg wishes to avoid getting roped along by 55 and hence he ‘outmaneuvers’ his challenger by folding to his tiny raise.
It’s easy for Greg to tell himself the story that V must have a strong hand. However, there are few combinations of strong hands, and this could quickly be a bluff. And if it’s a bluff — I want to compel V to fire that next covering. It’s far simpler for me to tell myself a tale that I’m behind than it is for the average gamer to proceed bluffing on the next street.
In The One Percent you are given a really basic number that overviews you with the question “just how commonly should I offer this bet/raise activity?” Versus smaller sized bets/raises, you really proceed a little bit extra.
For some players this will be awkward– but what’s the option?
Folding more is NOT a technique. It’s an economical band aid.
Continuing much more, compelling your opponent to appear with something, and realizing even more equity along the road is a far better technique.
In The One Percent you’ll discover just how often to continue in these areas and also the best ways to prioritize continuation combinations. Including even more minimal hands may be terrifying at first– but it’s vital that you don’t allow gamers to blow you off the pot frequently.
If you are incredibly sharp, you likely observed that all these leaks fit together. Playing like a slot machine versus tiny bets/raises is a huge issue. Bluffing hardly ever on the turn/river (due to being fit-or-fold) is a significant issue. And while you can execute a technique which contains these leaks and still revenue perfectly versus fish– you are not prepared to move up and play against harder players.
Over the next few sessions, be familiar with these leakages in your personal games. If you find yourself only providing action on turns & rivers with nuttier hands, note it. If you find yourself folding a lot versus tiny increases, note it.
Review all the hands you noted and see if the folds up and passive plays were as solid as you thought in real-time.
Often, you’ll locate they were just nitty folds, not good ones.
If you find yourself frequently making these errors and you want to spot them finally– get your copy of The One Percent and restore your online poker technique from the frequencies-up.
Real online texas hold’em poker isn’t about flopping monsters and sick checkouts. It’s about having a +EV technique and making use of the regularity problems in your opponents. It’s 100% workable & usable– you simply must know just what to search for.